Tag: Somato emotional release

  • Cranio Sacral Therapist and Student Newsletter 20

    January  18 – 2007

    Questions and comments for this issue:

    + Talking during treatment.
    + How the face reflects the cranial rhythm.
    + Why is the ventricular system so important?

    Hello,

    Let me just put my Hula Hoop down for a second
    so I can talk to you.  You don’t Hula?
    Why, it’s the latest re-fad.  You know, a fad
    that makes a comeback.

    In America, “hip hooping” classes, videos and
    Hoopster clothing lines are springing up across
    the country. Beyonce and Charlize Theron are huge
    fans.  They are always pestering me to join them
    at hip hooping class.

    I can see I’m wasting my time talking to you
    about this.  You just want to hear about cranio.

    Fair enough, let’s get on with the mailbag.

    ***QUESTION***

    Dear John,

    Thank you for your newsletters they are wonderful.

    Here is my question.
    I would like to get some of my patients more
    involved in their process when we are working
    together but I don’t want to do a full somato-
    emotional release type thing with them.
    Do you have any suggestions for an intermediary
    type approach I could do?

    Thanks again.
    PR.
    California.

    MY COMMENTS:

    Okey dokey.  Here’s something you can do.

    Once the person is on the table and you are
    settling in and chit chatting and generally
    entraining with them.

    No, not entertaining them, I said ENTRAINING
    with them. Now take that clown suit off and lets
    get back to the session.

    Tell the person that you are going to do
    something a bit different this week.  Keep your
    tone light.

    Take up a contact that allows you a good sense
    of the whole cranio sacral system.  Ask the person
    to close their eyes and begin to see themselves
    shrinking on the inside until they are small
    enough to walk around, inside the structures of
    their body.

    Whenever you are talking with a patient choose
    your words carefully.  I used the word ‘see’ on
    purpose.   ‘I want you to see yourself shrinking
    on the inside until you are small enough to be
    able to walk around inside the structure of your
    body.’

    Don’t say visualise or imagine as I have found
    these words can short circuit the process before
    it even gets started.

    Why?

    Well, because some people are convinced they
    have no imagination and others have tried
    visualisation before and are, ‘just no good at
    it.’

    Start off with a relatively restriction free
    area.  Ask the person to describe what it looks
    like.  Get them to describe the area in as much
    detail as possible.  Encourage them to tell you
    what they see, even though they may be inhibited
    by their lack of anatomical knowledge.

    They can shrink themselves to whatever size
    they need to be to pass between structures or see
    something in detail.  Ask them if everything looks
    okay in the area.  If it is, move on to another
    area, one where you sense a restriction, though
    you don’t need to tell them you think it is
    restricted.

    If they tell you that everything is NOT okay in
    an area, ask them to describe what it is that
    looks unnatural.  Encourage them to be as specific
    as possible.  You may need to move your hands
    closer to the area they are describing.

    Ask them what needs to happen for the area to
    return to a more natural state.

    Wait for their answer.

    If they are having difficulty seeing a way to
    correct the situation you can suggest solutions to
    them using the symbols they have communicated to
    you. Make full use of their size in the area.

    They can climb in between bones and push them
    apart.  They can pull and push things with their
    hands in very specific ways. You can suggest
    little tools that may help them, but avoid
    frightening tools like hammers and saws etc.

    You can suggest light beam machines to warm
    cold areas.  Ice guns for cold.  Muscle oil
    aerosol cans for tight or stiff muscles and so on.

    All the time you will be monitoring and
    following the changes they are making on the
    inside with your hands.

    This is generally an enjoyable technique for
    you and the person.  It seldom has a huge
    emotional aspect and is particularly good with
    patients who are very out of touch with their
    feelings.

    Most people don’t find it threatening and are
    amused by what they find in their bodies. They can
    be surprised at the clarity of the images they
    see. This is because the following of your hands
    enables the person to see more clearly the
    restriction in their bodies.

    This technique is a very useful way to involve
    the person and use their attention as an extension
    of yours, to check things out and correct them
    from the inside.

    As you get more experience with it you will get
    a sense of who this technique is appropriate for.
    It is a good introduction for other forms of
    therapeutic conversation which you may intend to
    use in future treatment sessions with the person.

    ***QUESTION***

    Dear John,
    I am currently studying the face and the way it
    moves with the cranial rhythm.  Frankly I find it
    confusing and hard to remember.

    I’m hopping you have some little analogy or trick
    for making it a bit clearer.

    Yours Sincerely.

    KS.
    Canada.

    MY COMMENTS:

    Before I get into the face I need to quickly
    run through flexion and extension in the cranium.

    Think of the cranium as a balloon.

    During extension the balloon narrows and
    elongates and during flexion it expands and
    becomes squat.  Long and thin in extension, short
    and squat in flexion.

    To understand the way the face moves with the
    cranial rhythm, take the balloon and add a small
    box.  Attach it to the balloon roughly where the
    face hangs off the cranium.

    Now, lets look at how the box moves with the
    balloon.

    In extension the balloon will become long and
    thin.  The box will arc inferiorly and narrow as
    the whole balloon elongates

    During flexion the balloon will become short
    and squat.  The box will arc superiorly and
    broaden as the balloon shortens and broadens.

    So what does this feel like in practice?

    Sit at the head of the person.  With their
    permission, place your hands on their face, thumbs
    on their forehead and fingers on their mandible.

    During flexion you will feel your thumbs and
    fingers move closer together while in extension
    they will move further apart.

    Once you get this overall movement you can work
    out the specifics of each bone relatively easily.

    Here are some other things to consider.  The
    mandible and the frontal bone moving towards each
    other in flexion could put stress on the bones of
    the face but this compressive movement is
    naturally absorbed by the orbits.

    This makes the orbits particularly vulnerable
    to any restriction patterns present in the face or
    cranium, especially the posterior aspect of the
    orbit.

    Certain bones of the face are designed to
    reduce the amplitude of the movement of some of
    the larger bones they articulate with. These bones
    are the palatines, the zygomae, the vomer and the
    ethmoid.

    You can think of them like ‘washers’ between
    two larger bones.  William Sutherland called these
    bones the ‘speed reducers’ but they do not
    actually reduce the frequency of the rhythm, they
    reduce the amount of movement or amplitude.  So a
    40 micron movement of the frontal can be reduced
    to a 10 micron movement in the Zygomae. [Remember
    a sheet of writing paper is 100 microns thick.]

    ***QUESTION***

    Hi John,
    I am being repeatedly told that the ventricles are
    very important but I am not sure why.  I have
    asked this question of my tutors repeatedly but
    never got a satisfactory answer.

    I would be grateful to hear your explanation.
    Thanking you in anticipation.
    PB
    South Africa

    MY COMMENTS:

    It may be easier for you to think of the whole
    system in terms of plumbing, which it is in a way.
    It’s a very important and significant plumbing
    system.

    The ventricular system, is a collection of
    cavities and canals deep within the brain and
    spinal cord. It consists of 4 ventricles connected
    by various channels.  It always looks to me like a
    model of a space ship.  Think Star Trek.

    The four ventricles are made up of the 2
    lateral Ventricles located within the two cerebral
    hemispheres, each of which connect via an inter-
    ventricular foramen to the 3rd ventricle which is
    located between the two thalami of the brain.

    The 3rd ventricle connects inferiorly through
    the cerebral aqueduct (or aqueduct of Sylvius as
    you will see it in some books) to the 4th
    ventricle which is located between the cerebellum,
    posteriorly and the pons and medulla, anteriorly.

    The 4th ventricle continues inferiorly as the
    central canal passing down the centre of the
    spinal cord.

    The whole ventricular System is filled with
    Cerebrospinal Fluid.

    So that’s the plumbing.  Now let’s look at
    inlet and outlet valves.

    The INLET valves are located in the roof of
    each of the four ventricles and are called Choroid
    Plexi.  These are filter like structures through
    which cerebrospinal fluid is formed as a filtrate
    from arterial blood.  Arterial blood enters the
    choroid plexi from the cerebral arteries; then
    blood cells, proteins and other large particles
    are filtered out.  The pure colourless fluid that
    filters through this choroid plexi into the
    ventricular system is cerebrospinal fluid.

    I will get to the outlet valves in a minute.
    First I want to focus on something that is very
    easy to get confused about.
    We know that the membrane system contains
    cerebrospinal fluid, right?

    Just nod.

    And now we have a good idea of how
    cerebrospinal fluid enters the ventricular system.
    And we also know the ventricular system is
    contained within the membrane system.  The thing
    is the ventricular system is, for the most part,
    closed.
    So how does cerebrospinal fluid get out of the
    ventricular system into the membrane system?

    Very good question.  It all happens in the 4th
    ventricle.  In the posterior and lateral walls of
    the 4th ventricle there are three foramina,  – the
    foramen of Magendie which is in the middle
    posteriorly and the 2 foramina of Luschka,
    bilaterally.

    It is through these 3 foramina that
    cerebrospinal fluid passes out into the sub-
    arachnoid space where it circulates around the
    brain and spinal Cord.

    Now back to the OUTLET valves.
    Cerebrospinal fluid is eventually returned to
    the blood via the Arachnoid Villi which protrude
    from the sub-arachnoid space through to the
    superior sagittal sinus of the Brain.  It re-joins
    the venous blood which then drains from the venous
    sinuses via the internal jugular Vein to be
    returned to the heart.

    So that’s the plumbing, the general flow and
    the inlet and outlet valves.   The significance is
    that this system is in continuous use which means
    it has to be in working order all the time.  If
    any one of the valves or canals of foramina are
    not working properly the effects are serious.

    Just think of the person having a spinal tap.
    Only a tiny amount of cerebrospinal fluid is
    removed yet the person will have to lie horizontal
    for 24 hours to avoid severe headaches.

    Also if there is a problem in this system it’s
    not like you can just shut it down while repairs
    are made.

    So that’s it for this issue.

    Cheerio for now.

    Till the next time.

    Your Mate,

    John D.

  • Cranio Sacral Therapist and Student Newsletter 24

    June 08 – 2007

    Questions and comments for this issue:

    + Do I use Somato emotional release?

    Hello,

    If you sent me an email towards the end of May
    and I didn’t reply, I’m not ignoring you and I am
    interested, no really.

    Sorry, . . what were you saying?

    My email server dropped the ball for about 5
    days and I didn’t get any mail so if you sent,
    please resend.

    I have some treats for you now and no, I’m not
    trying to butter you up.  Here are some videos of
    John Upledger talking about two cases he worked
    on. The volume is low so be ready to crank your
    speakers up.

    The first one is about a boy who had
    developmental delay, a spinal tap, cephaly,
    seizures and neutrapenia.  The video is in two
    parts.

    The second one is about a girl with hearing
    loss, seizures, and stiffman syndrome.  This video
    is in two parts also.

    The last one is of Dr John doing his thing. You
    may need to lower your volume for this one.

    As you know I gave my ‘Core Success’
    postgraduate seminar in Brisbane in April. Jenny
    Palmer organised the event and she has written an
    article about it, which you can read here.

    And speaking of postgraduate seminars, I have
    also got around to putting up an article about a
    full body release seminar I gave last year.  There
    are some good pictures of the full body team in
    action here.

    And lastly I am putting together a page of
    links for my web sites.  I have been collecting
    and book-marking web sites for a couple of years
    now an am just getting ready to share them.  So if
    you have a favourite website, a cause, an
    organization or a just plain funny site that you
    want to let me know about please send me the
    address.

    Anyhu, let’s get on with the
    mailbag.

    ***QUESTION***

    Dear John,
    Thank you for your newsletters.  I find them
    fascinating and very useful.  I particularly like
    what you say about craniosacral at the bottom of
    each newsletter. It is a vision which I fully
    support.

    So this is me participating by asking a question.
    I notice that you haven’t talked about somato
    emotional release in any of your newsletters.  I
    am wondering if you use it and what you think
    about it.
    Keep up the good work.

    KP
    Toronto.

    MY COMMENTS:

    I have received a number of emails asking me
    about somato emotional release.  I even had one asking
    about its lesser known culinary equivalent,
    Tomato emotional release.

    Boom. BOOM.
    I know. . .
    Tomato. . .
    No applause please.

    So I will combine your answer with the others.
    I don’t use somato emotional release per se.  What
    I use is a technique I developed called
    therapeutic inquiry.  My own cranio sacral
    training was somewhat osteopathic in approach and
    didn’t really encourage talking with the patient
    during treatment.  I felt this ignored a whole
    spectrum of possible information.

    I studied a couple of different talking
    approaches, including somato emotional release but
    found that none of them covered everything that
    needed to be covered.  I used elements from all
    and filled in the blanks.

    When it came time to teach this technique I
    called it therapeutic inquiry because the essence
    of what I was doing involved asking the patient
    the right questions, at the right time and in the
    right way.

    Not everyone needs to verbalise what they are
    experiencing when they are releasing a deep trauma
    but if they do then you need to know very clearly
    what is happening and be able to assist them
    verbally and that’s where therapeutic inquiry
    comes in.

    Knowing the difference between who needs to
    talk and who doesn’t is all part of the skill.

    At other times you will have a sense that
    someone is on the verge of releasing something and
    it is one of those releases that needs to come
    through the person’s consciousness.  The patient
    needs to verbalise it but it just won’t come,
    again this is where therapeutic inquiry comes in.

    Therapeutic inquiry is used to help a
    particular kind of restriction to release.  As you
    know, in the course of treatment we use different
    techniques for different kinds of restrictions,
    some require direct technique, some require
    indirect, some require remote work using intention
    away from the site of restriction while others
    require close work.
    Well some restrictions require therapeutic
    inquiry.  The sorts of restrictions that usually
    require therapeutic inquiry often have a big
    emotional component.

    To explain why you would need to use
    therapeutic inquiry, I need to talk a little bit
    about how these kinds of restrictions are formed.
    It usually happens during childhood and it goes
    something like this: (You can hum along if you
    know the tune.)

    A child finds itself in a situation it can’t
    cope with.  From the child’s perspective the
    situation is threatening to its survival.  The
    child needs to process the situation very fast and
    arrive at a solution that will insure its
    survival.  The child quickly reviews its part in
    the circumstances that have led to the current
    situation.
    It identifies the behaviour that is responsible
    and labels it as life threatening.  It then locks
    that behaviour away in its unconscious, setting up
    the emotional equivalent of a reflex arc.
    Too important to leave to mere memory, the
    child makes it part of its instinct.

    Instinct?

    If we hear a sudden loud noise our bodies will
    have an instinctive protective reaction.  Without
    thinking, our body interprets the noise as
    potentially dangerous and reacts to protect
    itself.  In these circumstances we are operating
    from our instinct.
    It is into this instinct that the child puts
    this emotional reflex arc.   Whenever the child is
    in a situation that is similar to the original
    situation, it will have an instinctive protective
    reaction.

    Back to our child.  Time passes and the child
    grows into an adult.  The difficult situation has
    passed but the embellished instinct does not
    change, it stays in place doing its job. Because
    it doesn’t adapt with the growth of the
    child/adult, what was once a lifesaver, becomes a
    source of disharmony in the persons body, or put
    another way, a restriction.

    Not clear enough? Okay here’s an example.

    A young boy pulls a chair over to the stove to
    investigate the strange wispy cloudy stuff coming
    from a pot.
    His mother enters the kitchen. Horrified, she
    sees her little darling about to scald himself.
    She rushes to the stove, pulls him away roughly,
    slaps him and tells him he is a very naughty boy.

    The boy can see she is very upset.  In an
    instant the boy decides the following, which I
    will explain in adult language.

    • ‘A. My mother is very angry with me.
      She has hit me and caused me pain.
      She normally doesn’t hit me.
      My mother is the source of love and
      nourishment in my life and if she
      continues to be angry, she will withhold
      her love and nourishment and she may
      continue hitting me.
    • B. If she withholds her love and nourishment
      and continues hitting me, I will die.
      C. What did I do that has caused this
      disturbance in my mother?

    Reviewing: : : : : – – – –

    Answer: I was being curious and
    adventurous.

    • D. I must incorporate into my instinct

    the following directive.

    WHENEVER I FEEL CURIOUS AND ADVENTUROUS
    I AM IN MORTAL DANGER AND MUST NEVER ACT
    ON THESE DANGEROUS FEELINGS.’

    The above conclusion is reached within minutes
    of being slapped.  The boy includes the new
    information in his instinct and gets on with his
    life.
    As an adult the boy/man finds change incredibly
    difficult.  He experiences abnormal stress at the
    prospect of changing house or jobs.  When his
    marriage breaks down he becomes so tense he has
    difficulty sleeping and experiences chest pains.

    Fortunately he goes to a cranio sacral
    therapist for help.

    Cranio Sacral Therapy to the rescue.
    High five!
    Low five!
    No?
    Suit yourself.

    Therapeutic inquiry allows the patient to get
    in contact with the embellished part of their
    instinct and begin to communicate with it.  All
    going well this dialogue will lead to changing the
    directive.

    I have found that a restriction will only
    change its function by a direct command from the
    person.  Even then it can be reluctant to accept
    that authority.  The command from the person has
    to be with the same emotional intensity with which
    the restriction was first imprinted, because the
    restriction was charged with the job of protecting
    the person against mortal danger.

    Restrictions are reluctant to return the
    authority if the person is half hearted.  They are
    understandably cautious because of the life &
    death imperative with which they were programmed.
    The difficult part of therapeutic inquiry is in
    easing this instinctive defensiveness.

    Therapeutic inquiry is a difficult technique to
    become competent in because it requires you to do
    all the difficult work you are already doing with
    your hands and presence AND include this very
    precise line of questioning.

    Just to give you a little window into the
    technical difficulty involved, there is a huge
    difference between asking,  ‘Are you afraid?’
    or asking, ‘How do you feel?’
    The first question suggests the
    idea of fear and in a nanosecond the patient will
    be thinking.
    ‘Why are they asking me this?  Is there
    something I should be afraid of?’

    Asking the patient how they feel allows them to
    tell you the way they are experiencing the
    situation; not the way you think they are
    experiencing the situation.

    It is very important to get it right because
    you are engaging with a very powerful part of the
    person and you don’t want to be messing around in
    there.  Therapeutic inquiry is the one technique
    that, far and above all the others, I found
    students have most difficulty becoming competent
    in.

    As with every ‘technique’ it is something that
    needs to be mastered and integrated.  In practice
    I rarely use isolated techniques and this includes
    therapeutic inquiry.  Everything blends together
    and is significant.

    From the first phone call with a new patient to
    everything I say to them and everything they say
    to me.  It is all significant and part of the
    blend of treatment

    So that’s it for this issue.

    Cheerio for now.

    Till the next time.

    Your Mate,

    John D.